Tasman Medical Journal

ISSN: 2652-1881

Familial hypercholesterolaemia: a common cause of premature coronary disease in the community and a paradigm for the practice of precision medicine

Jing Pang and Gerald F. Watts

ABSTRACT

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant dyslipidemia with an estimated worldwide prevalence of 1 in 250.  It is characterised by elevation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from birth.  If untreated, FH confers a significant risk for premature cardiovascular disease.  Recent publications provide a wealth of new information on screening approaches, genetic testing, risk prediction and new therapies such as the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies.  We present here the science of FH, a review of major advances in the care of FH in the form of a “how to” guide and an overview of initiatives for closing the worldwide gaps in care.  The reader is invited to check his or her family history of heart disease and cholesterol level to see whether FH is possible and requires early prophylactic treatment.

Full Text

Introduction Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is the most common and serious form of inherited high blood cholesterol.  The condition is the result of genetically determined inadequate clearance of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol by the liver.  Gene variants that impair this clearance pathway include LDLR (LDL receptor, which mediates the endocytosis of LDL), APOB (apolipoprotein B-100, the receptor ligand) and PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9.  This enzyme regulates cell surface receptors and degrades LDLR).  Inheritance is autosomal dominant, indicating that each first-degree relatives of individuals with heterozygous FH (heFH) have a 1 in 2 chance of having the condition.  An example of a pedigree depicting the dominant inheritance in a family with heFH is shown in Fig. 1.

Owing to high LDL-cholesterol levels from birth, individuals with FH are at very high risk of premature coronary artery disease (CAD) particularly if a diagnosis is overlooked and treatment is not initiated early.  With an estimated prevalence1 of 1 in 250 and 30 million affected people worldwide, FH is clearly a public health problem.  However, it remains under-diagnosed and under-treated.2,3

Fig.1. An example of a family pedigree depicting the dominant inheritance of familial hypercholesterolaemia.
Fig.1. An example of a family pedigree depicting the dominant inheritance of familial hypercholesterolaemia. From Pang et al 2013

Screening and diagnosis

There are several screening strategies for detecting FH.  These include selective, opportunistic, systematic and universal screening (Box 1).  Selective screening of patients with premature CAD, in high risk domains (eg.  coronary care units), offers a high detection rate of up to 1 in 10,4 but this strategy does not allow for primary prevention.  Recent data has shown that screening via biobanks5 and blood donors6 are good opportunistic approaches.  Screening of school children is another option but uptake may be low.7

In addition to opportunistic detection of cases, screening in the community can employ extraction tools that systematically search electronic health records in general practice,8-11 as well as the alerting of an LDL-cholesterol >5.0mmol/l on pathology reports to general practitioners for further assessment of FH.12  These methods, combined with cascade testing of first-and second-degree family members can increase diagnostic yield (Fig.1).  Cascade screening or family tracing is a systematic approach for identifying relatives of of an established index case.  Although demonstrated to be cost-effective,13,14 cascade screening ries on a supply of new index cases and motivated family members.15  Universal screening of children coupled with the “reverse” cascade testing of parents is potentially an effective method for detecting FH in the community and prior to CAD development.16  This approach appears acceptable17 and cost-effective.18.  However, universal screening has only been implemented in Slovenia,19 a country of only 2m people, and requires further evaluation and adaptation to different settings.

Comprehensive guidelines and models of care have been published,20,21 emphasising the importance of integrating screening strategies with clinical care services.  Nevertheless, the practicalities and cost-effectiveness of implementing and integrating all of these approaches remains to be demonstrated.

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of FH relies primarily on demonstrating a raised untreated plasma LDL-cholesterol concentration, though there is overlap between patients with common hyper-cholesterolaemia and heFH (Fig. 2).  Phenotypic tools with additional criteria such as family and personal history of premature CAD and clinical signs such as arcus cornealis and tendon xanthomata are widely used.  The most widely used tool is the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Score (DLCNS) (Table 1)3.  US guidelines have simply defined FH in adults using a family history of premature CAD and a plasma LDL-cholesterol greater than 4.9 mmol/l,22,23 but concordance with the “gold standard” genetic diagnosis of FH may be poor.24  An untreated total cholesterol or LDL-cholesterol alone can be used to diagnose FH in first-degree family members once a firm diagnosis has been established in the index case.  Cholesterol cut-offs should be adjusted for age and gender.25  There is also an overlap in plasma LDL-cholesterol between patients with one [heFH] or two mutations [homozygous FH (hoFH)] that impair the LDL-cholesterol clearance pathway.26   Recognising the continuum between heFH and hoFH, a pragmatic definition of “severe FH” has been proposed: plasma LDL-cholesterol >10.0 mmol/l alone, >8.0 mmol/l plus one major cardiovascular risk factor or >5.0 mmol/l plus two major cardiovascular risk factors.27  This definition has recently been shown to predict an adverse coronary outcome in the UK.28  However, it lacks the precision of a genetic diagnosis.  The use of genetic testing provides an accurate diagnosis of heFH and hoFH, and is therefore important for risk stratification, cost-effective deployment of lipid-lowering therapies and cascade family testing.  However, genetic testing has several barriers, such as significant cost, variant interpretations, potential impact on life insurance and limited genetic counselling services.29  Genetic testing is not widely available, but as we rapidly approach a new era of next-generation sequencing30 it should become more widespread.  In these circumstances, genetic counselling services for families with FH will be essential.

Fig. 2. The spectrum of LDL-cholesterol in familial hypercholesterolemia and the trend in estimated cardiovascular risk (not to scale).
Fig. 2. The spectrum of LDL-cholesterol in familial hypercholesterolemia and the trend in estimated cardiovascular risk (not to scale).

Assessing FH-related risk

Estimating risk in FH is important to guide therapy, particularly for those that can benefit from primary prevention.  Traditional risk factors are known to influence CAD risk in FH,31 but Framingham risk equations do not apply to individuals with FH.  FH-specific risk prediction algorithms have been developed.32  These models, however, still require verification across broad sample populations.

Genetic risk factors, such as increased plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentration,33 a high genetic CAD risk score or high polygenic cholesterol score,34,35 can predict adverse CAD risk, particularly in genetically defined FH.  However, the extent to which these genetic scores extend to different populations remains to be determined, as does their clinical use. 

Imaging of pre-clinical atherosclerosis may be a valuable tool for assessing risk in FH.  Cardiac computed tomography (CT) reliably ascertains coronary artery calcium (CAC) burden and focal stenosis.  CAC score has been shown to predict future CAD events in pre-symptomatic FH patients treated with statins.  CT angiography also has clinical appeal as it can improve risk stratification, guide treatment intensity and influence adherence to treatment, including lifestyle therapies.37  However, its economic value remains to be demonstrated.

Management

Treatment of elevated LDL-cholesterol in FH involves dietary and lifestyle changes (for example, a heart healthy diet and avoidance of smoking) and pharmacotherapy.  Dietary and lifestyle management may be the only treatment option for certain groups, such as pregnant women and younger children.

Drugs

Statins are the first-line pharmacotherapy and is now further supported by new evidence from many cohort and surrogate-endpoint studies as well as clinical trials.38-43  However, a significant proportion of patients do not reach LDL-cholesterol targets on high-intensity statins alone44 and additional therapy with ezetimibe or bile-acid sequestrants may be required.45  Supported by recent clinical trial data, PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies are now recommended as third-line treatment for FH (Table 2).23, 46-53  These antibodies inhibit PCSK9, a convertase enzyme involved in the degradation of LDL receptors in the liver, thereby reducing degradation of LDL receptors and increasing the clearance of LDL cholesterol from the circulation.  Given that the majority of adult FH patients will be on more than one drug, interactions and toxicity need to be closely monitored, with appropriate investigations of renal, liver and glucose biochemistry.21

Cholesterol Targets

Guideline recommended treatment targets for FH are a 50% initial reduction in plasma LDL-cholesterol concentration,23 followed by an LDL target of <2.6 mmol/l (if no CAD or major risk factors are present) or <1.8 mmol/l (if CAD or major risk factors are present).2,21,54  More recent guidelines have recommended LDL-cholesterol of <1.8 mmol/l for primary prevention and <1.4 mmol/l for secondary prevention (or very-high risk patients),55,56 which may translate to all FH patients requiring third-line PCSK9 inhibitor therapy.  However, the cost or cost-effectiveness implications of these recommendations have yet to be evaluated.

The Dutch Lipid Clinic Network for diagnosis of FH in adult index cases.
Table 1. The Dutch Lipid Clinic Network for diagnosis of FH in adult index cases. Adapted from WHO.86 * The highest value found in each group contributes to the aggregate score. If criteria are not met, section score = 0.

Pregnancy and Breastfeeding

Statins are contraindicated in pregnancy and during breastfeeding,57 although no association has been reported in cohort studies for birth defects, preterm delivery or lower birth weights.58  PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies are also contraindicated in pregnancy.54  Bile acid sequestrants are the only safe drugs to help control FH during pregnancy.21

Children

There is no good evidence for the age of initiation of statins or for LDL-cholesterol treatment targets in children, although Mendelian randomisation studies59 suggest that cholesterol should be lowered as early as possible.  Experts recommend that statins should be initiated in heFH children by the age of 10 years, or earlier if preferred by their parents.60,61  Children with hoFH should be immediately treated with statins and additional therapies at the time of diagnosis.  Recommended targets are a 50% reduction in plasma LDL-cholesterol concentration60 or LDL-cholesterol <3.5 mmol/l for heFH,61 and <2.6 mmol/l62 and <1.8 mmol/l for hoFH children without and with symptomatic CAD, respectively.62,63

Lipoprotein Apheresis

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is recommended for hoFH and severe heFH patients who

remain above LDL-cholesterol treatment targets despite being on maximal drug therapy.21,64  Recent studies confirm that the cardiovascular benefits of LA are related to the degree of reduction in the cumulative exposure to LDL-cholesterol65 and the reduction in arterial inflammation.66  However, LA is not widely available.67  As a final option, liver transplantation may be considered for young patients with hoFH and rapidly progressing CAD.68

New therapies Several new therapies for lowering LDL-cholesterol are in the early phases of clinical trials.  These agents could have indications for FH patients who cannot tolerate maximal doses of currently available pharmacotherapy or who have refractory hoFH.  PCSK9 may be targeted with long-acting small interfering RNA (inclisiran)69 with much lower injection frequency compared with the PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies.  For hoFH patients, therapies that act via a different pathway from current agents may be most useful.  One such agent is an ANGPTL3 inhibitor (evinacumab).  Evinacumab offers a new and promising opportunity for the further lowering of LDL-cholesterol.70

Box 1. Summary of approaches to screening. Adapted from Pang et al 2013.85
  • Selective screening of high-risk coronary patients
  • Opportunistic screening for family history and lipid profile
  • Opportunistic alerts and interpretative comments on pathology reports
  • Systematic searching of medical records
  • Universal screening of children
  • “Cascade” screening of family members

Treatment adherence

Poor treatment adherence is associated with increased risk of CAD.71  Hence, it is vital to carefully address concerns and beliefs that patients may have in relation to use of medication.72  This includes health literacy73 as well as the impact of media reports on the perceptions of statins.74  Improving the quality of the shared decision making process75 can be facilitated by the use of decision aids.76

Australian and international initiatives

Developments in Australia include a seminal model of care,20 which has informed international clinical practice on the care of FH.21  A national web-based registry was established in 2015 and contains over 40 clinical sites and more than  1500 subjects across states.77  The Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme has subsidized PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for hoFH and heFH patients with and without CAD.  In mid-2019 the Medical Services Advisory Committee of the Australian Government recommended that genetic testing for FH be included in the Medicare Benefits Schedule, and final approval is awaited.  International efforts have also been initiated to share knowledge and expertise, develop research collaborations and promote early diagnosis and more effective treatments to address this global health challenge.

Basic treatment scheme for adults with familial hypercholesterolemia.
Table 2. Basic treatment scheme for adults with familial hypercholesterolemia. Adapted from Gidding et al 2015.22

The drive to improve the detection and management of FH is underscored by several international and regional initiatives.  The Familial Hypercholesterolemia Studies Collaboration (FHSC) and the Homozygous International Clinical Collaborators (a registry of hoFH patients), are examples of international efforts to capture a global dataset on FH.78,79  Regionally one can mention the FH Foundation in the US,80 the “10 Countries Study” in the Asia-Pacific region,81 the ScreenPro FH Project in central, southern and eastern Europe,82 the Ibero-American FH Network, and the Gulf FH Foundation.  A scientific statement from the American Heart Association has identified a number of key research gaps in FH.22  An ongoing research program focusing on critical questions across the continuum of care is essential21 and these healthcare gaps need to be closed through adequately funded research and implementation.21,22

Patient support and advocacy groups are essential for raising FH awareness in the general public, as well as for advocating for improvement in care and in particular, access to new therapies.83  FH Awareness Day (24th September annually) has been adopted as an annual campaign for FH awareness-raising activities.  The impact of patient support networks are exemplified by the activities of the US FH Foundation, Heart UK and the European FH Patient Network.83

Conclusion

Patients with FH have a very high risk of premature CAD and need to be targeted for early intervention.  As there is a major shortfall in the detection and treatment of FH worldwide, FH is a global health priority.81  To improve outcomes of FH patients over their lifespan, close collaborations between various stakeholders such as patients, providers, organisations, politicians and the community are essential to translate advances in knowledge into societal-wide health policy and routine high quality care.  Updating the WHO Report from 1998 in collaboration with the World Heart Federation is a significant first step for effectively implementing improved global care for FH.84 And the message to individuals is this: if you have a family history of early heart disease please see you doctor and have your cholesterol measured.  This may save you and your relatives from a possibly fatal heart attack.

Correspondence:  Professor G F Watts, GPO Box X2213 Perth WA 6847 Australia.

Email:  gerald.watts@uwa.edu.au

REFERENCES

  1. Akioyamen LE, Genest J, Shan SD, Reel RL, Albaum JM, Chu A, et al. Estimating the prevalence of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  BMJ Open.  2017;7:e016461.
  2. Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease.  Eur Heart J.  2013; 34: 3478-90
  3. Vallejo-Vaz AJ, De Marco M, Stevens CAT, Akram A, Freiberger T, Hovingh GK, et al. Overview of the current status of familial hypercholesterolaemia care in over 60 countries – The EAS Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Studies Collaboration (FHSC).  Atherosclerosis.  2018; 277: 234-55.
  4. Amor-Salamanca A, Castillo S, Gonzalez-Vioque E, Dominguez F, Quintana L, Lluís-Ganella C, et al. Genetically confirmed familial hypercholest-erolemia in patients with acute coronary syndrome.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  2017; 70: 1732-40.
  5. Alver M, Palover M, Saar A, Lall K, Zekavat SM, Tonisson N, et al. Recall by genotype and cascade screening for familial hypercholesterolemia in a population-based biobank from Estonia.  Genet Med.  2019; 21: 1173-80.
  6. Jackson CL, Keeton JZ, Eason SJ, Ahmad ZA, Ayers CR, Gore MO, et al. Identifying familial hypercholesterolemia using a blood donor screening program with more than 1 million volunteer donors.  JAMA cardiology.  2019; 4: 685-9.
  7. Kreissl A, Walleczek N, Espina PR, Hallwirth U, Greber-Platzer S. Selective screening for familial hypercholesterolemia in Austrian children – first year results.  BMC Pediatr.  2019; 19: 208.
  8. Banda JM, Sarraju A, Abbasi F, Parizo J, Pariani M, Ison H, et al. Finding missed cases of familial hypercholesterolemia in health systems using machine learning.  npj Digital Medicine.  2019; 2: 23.
  9. Weng S, Kai J, Akyea R, Qureshi N. Detection of familial hypercholesterolaemia: external validation of the FAMCAT clinical case-finding algorithm to identify patients in primary care.  The Lancet Public Health.  2019; 4: e256-e64.
  10. Troeung L, Arnold-Reed D, Chan She Ping-Delfos W, Watts GF, Pang J, Lugonja M, et al. A new electronic screening tool for identifying risk of familial hypercholesterolaemia in general practice.  Heart.  2016; 102: 855-61.
  11. Safarova MS, Liu H, Kullo IJ. Rapid identification of familial hypercholesterolemia from electronic health records: the SEARCH study.  J Clin Lipidol.  2016; 10: 1230-9.
  12. Bell DA, Edwards G, Hooper AJ, McMahon J, van Bockxmeer FM, Watts GF, et al. The potential role of an expert computer system to augment the opportunistic detection of individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia from a community laboratory.  Clin Chim Acta.  2015; 448: 18-21.
  13. Kerr M, Pears R, Miedzybrodzka Z, Haralambos K, Cather M, Watson M, et al. Cost effectiveness of cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia, based on data from familial hypercholesterolaemia services in the UK.  Eur Heart J.  2017: ehx111.
  14. Ademi Z, Watts GF, Pang J, Sijbrands EJG, van Bockxmeer FM, O’Leary P, et al. Cascade screening based on genetic testing is cost-effective: evidence for the implementation of models of care for familial hypercholesterolaemia.  J Clin Lipidol.  2014; 8: 390-400.
  15. Morris JK, Wald DS, Wald NJ. The evaluation of cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolemia.  American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A.  2012; 158: 78-84.
  16. Wald DS, Bestwick JP, Morris JK, Whyte K, Jenkins L, Wald NJ. Child–parent familial hyper-cholesterolemia screening in primary care. N Engl J Med.  2016; 375: 1628-37.
  17. Bowman FL, Molster CM, Lister KJ, Bauskis AT, Garton-Smith J, Vickery AW, et al. Identifying perceptions and preferences of the general public concerning universal screening of children for familial hypercholesterolaemia.  Public Health Genomics.  2019; 22: 25-35
  18. McKay AJ, Hogan H, Humphries SE, Marks D, Ray KK, Miners A. Universal screening at age 1–2 years as an adjunct to cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia in the UK: A cost-utility analysis.  Atherosclerosis.  2018; 275: 434-43.
  19. Klančar G, Grošelj U, Kovač J, Bratanič N, Bratina N, Podkrajšek KT, et al. Universal screening for familial hypercholesterolemia in children.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  2015; 66: 1250-7.
  20. Watts GF, Sullivan DR, Poplawski N, van Bockxmeer F, Hamilton-Craig I, Clifton PM, et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia: A model of care for Australasia.  Atherosclerosis Supp.  2011; 12: 221-63.
  21. Watts GF, Gidding S, Wierzbicki AS, Toth PP, Alonso R, Brown WV, et al. Integrated guidance on the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia from the international fh foundation.  Int J Cardiol.  2014; 171: 309-25.
  22. Gidding SS, Champagne MA, de Ferranti SD, Defesche J, Ito MK, Knowles JW, et al. The agenda for familial hypercholesterolemia – a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.  Circulation.  2015; 132: 2167-92
  23. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the management of blood cholesterol.  a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines.  2019; 73: e285-e350.
  24. Chan DC, Pang J, Hooper AJ, Bell DA, Bates TR, Burnett JR, et al. A comparative analysis of phenotypic predictors of mutations in familial hypercholesterolemia.  J Clin Endocrinol Metab.  2018; 103: 1704-14.
  25. Starr B, Hadfield G, Hutton BA, Lansberg PJ, Leren TP, Damgaard D, et al. Development of sensitive and specific age-and gender-specific low-density lipoprotein cholesterol cutoffs for diagnosis of first-degree relatives with familial hyper-cholesterolaemia in cascade testing.  Clin Chem Lab Med.  2008; 46: 791-803.
  26. Sturm AC, Knowles JW, Gidding SS, Ahmad ZS, Ahmed CD, Ballantyne CM, et al. Clinical genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  2018; 72: 662-80.
  27. Santos RD, Gidding SS, Hegele RA, Cuchel MA, Barter PJ, Watts GF, et al. Defining severe familial hypercholesterolaemia and the implications for clinical management: a consensus statement from the International Atherosclerosis Society Severe Familial Hypercholesterolemia Panel.  Lancet Diab-etes & Endocrinology.  2016; 4: 850–61.
  28. Humphries SE, Cooper JA, Capps N, Durrington PN, Jones B, McDowell IFW, et al. Coronary heart disease mortality in severe vs.  non-severe familial hypercholesterolaemia in the Simon Broome Register.  Atherosclerosis.  2019; 281: 207-12.
  29. Hendricks-Sturrup RM, Mazor KM, Sturm AC, Lu CY. Barriers and facilitators to genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia in the United States: A review.  Journal of Personalized Medicine.  2019; 9: 32.
  30. Hooper AJ, Burnett JR, Bell DA, Watts GF. The present and the future of genetic testing in familial hypercholesterolemia: opportunities and caveats.  Curr Atheroscler Rep.  2018; 20: 31.
  31. Akioyamen LE, Genest J, Chu A, Inibhunu H, Ko DT, Tu JV. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in heterozygous familial hypercholest-erolemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.  J Clin Lipidol.  2019; 13: 15-30.
  32. Pérez de Isla L, Alonso R, Mata N, Fernández-Pérez C, Muñiz O, Díaz-Díaz JL, et al. Predicting cardiovascular events in familial hypercholesterolemia: The SAFEHEART Registry.  Circulation.  2017; 135: 2133-44.
  33. Chan DC, Pang J, Hooper AJ, Burnett JR, Bell DA, Bates TR, et al. Elevated lipoprotein(a), hypertension and renal insufficiency as predictors of coronary artery disease in patients with genetically confirmed heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.  Int J Cardiol.  2015; 201: 633-8.
  34. Trinder M, Li X, DeCastro ML, Cermakova L, Sadananda S, Jackson LM, et al. Risk of premature atherosclerotic disease in patients with monogenic versus polygenic familial hypercholesterolemia.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  2019; 74: 512-22.
  35. Paquette M, Chong M, Thériault S, Dufour R, Paré G, Baass A. Polygenic risk score predicts prevalence of cardiovascular disease in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.  J Clin Lipidol.  2017; 11: 725-32.e5.
  36. Miname MH, Bittencourt MS, Moraes SR, Alves RIM, Silva PRS, Jannes CE, et al. Coronary artery calcium and cardiovascular events in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia receiving standard lipid-lowering therapy. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging.  2018; 12: 1797-1804
  37. Gupta A, Lau E, Varshney R, Hulten EA, Cheezum M, Bittencourt MS, et al. The identification of calcified coronary plaque is associated with initiation and continuation of pharmacological and lifestyle preventive therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging.  2017; 10: 833-42.
  38. Besseling J, Hovingh GK, Huijgen R, Kastelein JJP, Hutten BA. Statins in Familial hypercholesterolemia: consequences for coronary artery disease and all-cause mortality.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  2016; 68: 252-60.
  39. Kusters DM, Avis HJ, de Groot E, Wijburg FA, Kastelein JJ, Wiegman A, et al. Ten-year follow-up after initiation of statin therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia.  JAMA.  2014; 312: 1055-7.
  40. Humphries S, Cooper J, Seed M, Capps N, Durrington P, Jones B, et al. Coronary heart disease mortality in treated familial hypercholesterolaemia: Update of the UK Simon Broome FH register.  Atherosclerosis.  2018; 274: 41-6.
  41. Vallejo-Vaz AJ, Robertson M, Catapano AL, Watts GF, Kastelein JJ, Packard CJ, et al. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease among men with primary elevations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of 190 mg/dL or above: analyses from the WOSCOPS (west of Scotland coronary prevention study) 5-year randomized trial and 20-year observational follow-up.  Circulation.  2017; 136: 1878-91.
  42. Braamskamp MJ, Langslet G, McCrindle BW, Cassiman DM, Francis GA, Gagne C, et al. Effect of rosuvastatin on carotid intima-media thickness in children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: The CHARON Study.  Circulation.  2017; 136: 359-66.
  43. Bos S, Duvekot MHC, ten Kate G-JR, Verhoeven AJM, Mulder MT, Schinkel AFL, et al. Carotid artery plaques and intima medial thickness in familial hypercholesteraemic patients on long-term statin therapy: A case control study.  Atherosclerosis.  2017; 256: 62-6.
  44. Perez de Isla L, Alonso R, Watts GF, Mata N, Saltijeral Cerezo A, Muñiz O, et al. Attainment of ldl-cholesterol treatment goals in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: 5-Year SAFE-HEART Registry Follow-Up.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  2016; 67: 1278-85.
  45. Watts GF, Pang J, Chan DC, Brunt JN, Lewis B. Angiographic progression of coronary athero-sclerosis in patients with familial hypercholest-erolaemia treated with non-statin therapy: Impact of a fat-modified diet and a resin.  Atherosclerosis.  2016; 252: 82-7.
  46. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Alirocumab for treating primary hypercholesterolaemia and mixed dys-lipidaemia. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta393.
  47. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Evolocumab for treating primary hypercholesterolaemia and mixed dys-lipidaemia.  https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta394.
  48. Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, Wiklund O, Chapman MJ, Drexel H, et al. 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias.  Eur Heart J.  2016; 37: 2999-3058.
  49. Landmesser U, Chapman MJ, Stock JK, Amarenco P, Belch JJF, Borén J, et al. 2017 Update of ESC/EAS Task Force on practical clinical guidance for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibition in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or in familial hyper-cholesterolaemia.  Eur Heart J.  2017; 39: 1131-43.
  50. Harada-Shiba M, Arai H, Ishigaki Y, Ishibashi S, Okamura T, Ogura M, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of familial hypercholest-erolemia 2017.  J Atheroscler Thromb.  2018; 25: 751-70.
  51. Raal FJ, Hovingh GK, Catapano AL. Familial hypercholesterolemia treatments: guidelines and new therapies.  Atherosclerosis.  2018; 277: 483-92.
  52. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, et al. Evolocumab and Clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease.  N Engl J Med.  2017; 376: 1713-22.
  53. Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, Bhatt DL, Bittner VA, Diaz R, et al. Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome.  N Engl J Med.  2018; 379: 2097-107.
  54. Brunham LR, Ruel I, Aljenedil S, Rivière J-B, Baass A, Tu JV, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society Position Statement on Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Update 2018.  Can J Cardiol.  2018; 34: 1553-63.
  55. Jellinger PS, Handelsman Y, Rosenblit PD, Bloomgarden ZT, Fonseca VA, Garber AJ, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Guidelines for management of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease.  Endocr Pract.  2017; 23: 1-87.
  56. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, Koskinas KC, Casula M, Badimon L, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk: The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS). Eur Heart J. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455.
  57. Regitz-Zagrosek V, Roos-Hesselink JW, Bauersachs J, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Cifkova R, De Bonis M, et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy.  Eur Heart J.  2018; 39: 3165-241.
  58. Toleikyte I, Retterstøl K, Leren TP, Iversen PO. Pregnancy outcomes in familial hypercholest-erolemia – a registry-based study.  Circulation.  2011; 124: 1606-14.
  59. Ference BA, Schunkert H, Watts GF, Borén J, Fazio S, Horton JD, et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.  1.  Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies.  A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel.  Eur Heart J.  2017; 38: 2459-72.
  60. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. NICE Clinical Guideline 71: familial hypercholesterolaemia: identification and manage-ment (Updated November 2017).  2017.
  61. Wiegman A, Gidding SS, Watts GF, Chapman MJ, Ginsberg HN, Cuchel M, et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia in children and adolescents: gaining decades of life by optimizing detection and treatment.  Eur Heart J.  2015; 36: 2425-37.
  62. de Ferranti SD, Steinberger J, Ameduri R, Baker A, Gooding H, Kelly AS, et al. Cardiovascular risk reduction in high-risk pediatric patients: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.  Circulation.  2019; 139: e603-e34.
  63. Cuchel M, Bruckert E, Ginsberg HN, Raal FJ, Santos RD, Hegele RA, et al. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: new insights and guidance for clinicians to improve detection and clinical management.  A position paper from the Consensus Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolaemia of the European Atherosclerosis Society.  Eur Heart J.  2014; 35: 2146-57.
  64. Stefanutti C, Julius U, Watts GF, Harada-Shiba M, Cossu M, Schettler VJ, et al. Toward an international consensus—Integrating lipoprotein apheresis and new lipid-lowering drugs.  J Clin Lipidol.  2017; 11: 858-71.e3.
  65. Thompson GR, Blom DJ, Marais AD, Seed M, Pilcher GJ, Raal FJ. Survival in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia is determined by the on-treatment level of serum cholesterol.  Eur Heart J.  2017: ehx317.
  66. van Wijk DF, Sjouke B, Figueroa A, Emami H, van der Valk FM, MacNabb MH, et al. Nonpharmacological lipoprotein apheresis reduces arterial inflammation in familial hypercholesterol-emia.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  2014; 64: 1418-26.
  67. Pang J, Chan D, Hu M, Muir L, Kwok S, Charng M, et al. Comparative aspects of the care of familial hypercholesterolemia in the “Ten Countries Study”.  J Clin Lipidol.  2019; 13: 287-300.
  68. Ishigaki Y, Kawagishi N, Hasegawa Y, Sawada S, Katagiri H, Satomi S, et al. Liver transplantation for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.  J Atheroscler Thromb.  2019; 26: 121-7.
  69. Ray KK, Landmesser U, Leiter LA, Kallend D, Dufour R, Karakas M, et al. Inclisiran in patients at high cardiovascular risk with elevated LDL cholest-erol.  New Engl J Med.  2017; 376: 1430-40.
  70. Gaudet D, Gipe DA, Pordy R, Ahmad Z, Cuchel M, Shah PK, et al. ANGPTL3 inhibition in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.  N Engl J Med.  2017; 377: 296-7.
  71. Rosenson RS, Baker S, Banach M, Borow KM, Braun LT, Bruckert E, et al. Optimizing cholesterol treatment in patients with muscle complaints.  J Am Coll Cardiol.  2017; 70: 1290-301.
  72. Hagger MS, Hardcastle SJ, Hu M, Kwok S, Lin J, Nawawi HM, et al. Effects of medication, treatment, and behavioral beliefs on intentions to take medication in patients with familial hypercholest-erolemia.  Atherosclerosis.  2018; 277: 493-501.
  73. Hagger MS, Hardcastle SJ, Hu M, Kwok S, Lin J, Nawawi HM, et al. Health literacy in familial hypercholesterolemia: A cross-national study.  European Journal of Preventive Cardiology.  2018; 25: 936-43.
  74. Nielsen SF, Nordestgaard BG. Negative statin-related news stories decrease statin persistence and increase myocardial infarction and cardiovascular mortality: a nationwide prospective cohort study.  Eur Heart J.  2015: ehv641.
  75. Barrett B, Ricco J, Wallace M, Kiefer D, Rakel D. Communicating statin evidence to support shared decision-making.  BMC family practice.  2016; 17: 41.
  76. Hasnie AA, Kumbamu A, Safarova MS, Caraballo PJ, Kullo IJ. A clinical decision support tool for familial hypercholesterolemia based on physician input.  Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes.  2018; 2: 103-12.
  77. Napier KR, Pang J, Lamont L, Walker CE, Dawkins HJS, Hunter AA, et al. A Web-Based registry for familial hypercholesterolaemia.  Heart Lung Circ.  2017; 26: 635-9.
  78. Vallejo-Vaz AJ, Akram A, Kondapally Seshasai SR, Cole D, Watts GF, Hovingh GK, et al. Pooling and expanding registries of familial hyper-cholesterolaemia to assess gaps in care and  improve disease management and outcomes: Rationale and design of the global EAS Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Studies Collaboration.  Atherosclerosis Supplements.  2016; 22: 1-32.
  79. Ray KK, Watts GF. Improving the global care of familial hypercholesterolaemia: Starting the ball rolling.  Atherosclerosis.  2018; 277: 230-3.
  80. Knowles JW, O’Brien EC, Greendale K, Wilemon K, Genest J, Sperling LS, et al. Reducing the burden of disease and death from familial hypercholesterolemia: A call to action.  Am Heart J.  2014; 168: 807-11.
  81. Vallejo-Vaz AJ, Kondapally Seshasai SR, Cole D, Hovingh GK, Kastelein JJP, Mata P, et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia: A global call to arms.  Atherosclerosis.  2015; 243: 257-9.
  82. Ceska R, Latkovskis G, Ezhov MV, Freiberger T, Lalic K, Mitchenko O, et al. The impact of the international cooperation on familial hyper-cholesterolemia screening and treatment: results from the ScreenPro FH Project.  Curr Atheroscler Rep.  2019; 21: 36.
  83. Payne J, Williams S, Maxwell D, Pariente MT, Olivares RA, Janssen ten Haaf M, et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia patient support groups and advocacy: A multinational perspective. Athero-sclerosis. 2018; 277: 377-82.
  84. Representatives of the Global Familial Hypercholesterolemia Community. Reducing the clinical and public health burden of familial hypercholesterolemia – a global call to action – A Report from Consensus Conferences Celebrating the 20th Anniversary of the 1998 World Health Organization Report on Familial Hyperchol-esterolemia Convened by the FH Foundation and the World Heart Federation.  JAMA Cardiology, In Press.
  85. Pang J, Vickery A, Watts G. Familial hypercholesterolemia: bridging and minding the gap in healthcare.  Advances in dyslipidemia (book chapter).  London: Future Medicine.  2013, pp 18-41.
  86. World Health Organization. Familial Hypercholesterolaemia: Report of a WHO consultation.  Paris: World Health Organisation; 1997.

Publication Categories

AUTHOR INFORMATION

PhD Jing Pang

INSTITUTIONAL AFFILIATIONS
School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

MD DSc FRACP FRCP Gerald F. Watts

INSTITUTIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Lipid Disorders Clinic, Cardiometabolic Services, Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia