Tasman Medical Journal

ISSN: 2652-1881

The role of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in peri-operative risk stratification prior to non-cardiac surgery

Mayura T Iddagoda

View / Download PDF


Adverse events are common after non-cardiac surgery and are associated with increasedperioperative mortality and morbidity. Risk stratification is vital to minimize those adverse outcomes and also facilitates informed decision-making by patients when consenting.  The use of biomarkers in risk stratification has been discussed in the literature. Amongst them, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) has been studied widely as a predictor of perioperative adverse outcomes.  However, there is no global consensus on its use.  The aim of this review is to discuss evidence and guidelines on the use of BNP in perioperative risk stratification prior to non-cardiac surgery.  Tasman Medical Journal 2020; 2: 28-33.

Full Text


Risk stratification of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery is vital to minimize peri-operative adverse cardiac and cardiovascular outcomes.1 Integrated multimodal evaluation, including functional assessment, cardiovascular risk calculation and surgical stress categorization, appears to be a better predictor of adverse cardiac outcomes than single mode review.2 Surgery causes myocardial stress and increases cardiovascular risk and mortality.3  However, myocardial stress and damage during peri-operative period may be asymptomatic due to several other factors such as the use of opiate and other analgesics.4 Therefore, biomarkers appear to be better predictors of myocardial damage across all types of surgical procedures, as described in the 4th universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018).5  Amongst those predictors, troponin and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are the main biomarkers investigated to date.6 Troponin measured after non-cardiac surgery is better in detecting myocardial infarction than in prediction obtained pre-operatively.7

Preoperative BNP has also been studied as a predictor of adverse cardiac outcomes and mortality after major surgical procedures.8 BNP and its inactive form, N-terminal prohormone BNP (NT-proBNP) are released from cardiac myocytes in response to myocardial stress.9 Serum concentrations of BNP/NT-proBNP can be measured in peripheral blood. Several meta-analyses and systematic reviews have demonstrated that BNP/NT-proBNP levels predict adverse cardiac outcomes including non-fatal myocardial infarction, cardiac death after non-cardiac surgery, and non-fatal myocardial infarction at 30 days after surgery.10-15  I review here the role of elevated BNP in perioperative risk stratification for non-cardiac procedures.  Priority was given to prospective studies that investigated BNP/NT-proBNP prior to non-cardiac surgery and its prognostication ability for adverse outcomes. 

Pathophysiology of BNP release

BNP is a small protein molecule belonging to a group of hormones called ‘natriuretic peptides’.  Other members of the group are atrial natriuretic peptides (ANP), C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP), and Dendroaspis  natriuretic peptide (DNP).16  In fact, DNP can be detected in human plasma and atrial myocardium in heart failure, but its role has not been fully elucidated.17  Dilatation and stretching of ventricles from various physiological  and pathophysiological states cause release of BNP to blood stream.  Some of the causal factors for ventricular dilatation are volume overload, sympathetic stimulation and inflammatory response in the peri-operative period.18  The inactive prohormone of BNP (N-terminal pro-hormone BNP or NT-proBNP) can also be detected in blood and gives rise to BNP by cleavage of the 76-amino acid N-terminal peptide. The physiological ANP and BNP effects involve reduction of renal salt and water reabsorption, leading to polyuria, natriuresis, and decreased circulatory blood volume.9 Raised plasma BNP/NT-proBNP is evident predominantly in heart failure and other situations of ventricular dilatation and intraventricular pressure (Fig. 1).  Patient age, body mass and renal function also contribute to increased BNP/NT-proBNP.6

Figure 1 BNP mechanism of action. ANP, atrial natriuretic peptide; BNP, brain natriuretic peptide

Pre-operative hypotension is associated with increased post-operative mortality.19 During surgery, various mechanisms could increase BNP levels and be responsible for hypotension. However the evidence for BNP-driven hypotension as a cause of adverse outcomes is difficult to prove as other mechanisms for peri-operative hypotension such as blood loss and anaesthetic drugs are often present. 

Current evidence on BNP as a predictor of surgical risk

I searched the literature search for original studies published on BNP or NT-proBNP in peri-operative cardiovascular risk stratification.  Reviews were not included.  Several large-scale prospective studies were identified.

A prospective study of pre-operative BNP (>189 pg/ml) levels evaluated adverse cardiovascular events in 1590 patients undergoing non cardiac surgery. There were 21 cardiac deaths, 20 cases of nonfatal myocardial infarction, and 41 cases of acute pulmonary oedema, with total event rate of 6%.20  Another smaller study assessed 41 high risk patients with moderate to severe pre-operative cardiac failure (ejection fraction <40%) or severe aortic stenosis undergoing vascular surgery.  Mean BNP of 1366± 1420 pg/mlwas noted in patients with adverse cardiac events compared to 167 ± 194 pg/ml in patients without adverse events.21  Similar findings were observed in 279 elderly patientsundergoing non-cardiac surgery.22 NT-proBNP levels >201 pg/ml was independently associated with high incidence of peri-operative complications.  The sensitivity and specificity were 80% and 81% respectively.  NT-proBNP levels were also associated with cardiovascular risk.22

A study of 2519 patients over 59 years of age undergoing emergency non-cardiac surgery assessed risk of adverse outcomes using pre-operative BNP and troponin (cT). The major adverse cardiac event rate of 10% was independently associated with preoperative BNP and cT (P <0.001).23  There was a close relationship with pre-operative BNP levels and cardiovascular events post-operatively even in low-risk patients.24

Though almost all studies have demonstrated a statistically significant association between BNP/NT-proBNP and major adverse cardiac events after non-cardiac surgery, the challenge is to identify a threshold concentration above which a patient is at unacceptable high risk of cardiac complications. However any threshold value is likely to have poor sensitivity and specificity.  In the above studies, patients with BNP as low as 36 pg/ml had adverse cardiac outcomes.25  A wide variation in BNP units of measurement and cut off values existed in these studies. Heterogeneity of available BNP assays, half-life differences between BNP versus NT-proBNP and variability of study cohorts by surgical and cardiovascular risk could have contributed to this variability.26   In addition, physiological biomarkers may vary in their response to the pathophysiology arising during surgery, and this may affect their use as predictors of risk.

Current recommendations on BNP in perioperative care

Major guidelines currently provide limited recommendations for the usage of BNP in peri-operative setting (Table 1). The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association do not currently mention use of peri-operative BNP for risk assessment. This is due to factors such as variable timeframes of BNP used in studies, limited randomized data and lack of guidelines for treatment when biomarker concentrations are abnormal.27  However, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) guidelines recommend BNP or NT-proBNP in high-risk patients undertaking elective surgery, defined as patients aged 65 years or older or patients aged 45 to 64 with cardiovascular risk factors.28  Cardiovascular risk was calculated based on the vascular history or a point in the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI).  This was further described according to the timing of surgery in the CCS guidelines (Table 2). 

Table 1 International guideline recommendations supporting BNP in risk stratification for non-cardiac surgery. ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; ESC/ESA, European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Anaesthesia; CCS, Canadian Cardiovascular Society; RCRI, Revised Cardiac Risk Index.

Furthermore, the CCS provided risk estimation of death or myocardial infarction within 30 days after non-cardiac surgery based on pre-operative BNP and NT-proBNP levels (Table 3).  The European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESC/ESA) guidelines mention pre-operative BNP/NT-proBNP merely as an added prognostic factor for predicting adverse cardiac events.27  Application of BNP/NT-proBNP as an independent predictor for peri-operative and late cardiac events, was able to provide only class IIb level of evidence. Routine use of biomarkers is not recommended in ESC/ESA guidelines.29  

Table 2.  Perioperative cardiac risk factor management for patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, as suggested by the Canadian Cardiac Society (CCS). CVD, Cardiovascular Disease; BNP, Brain Natriuretic Peptide; NT-proBNP, N-Terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide. Adapted from Fig. 1.28

No studies that considered or demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of BNP/NT-proBNP in perioperative risk stratification and prognostication were identified in the search.  Widespread pre-operative measurement of BNP/NT-proBNP on empirical grounds would be costly and unlikely to be cost-effective. This contrasts with the situation in heart failure, where routine BNP monitoring compared to a symptom-based approach is cost effective.30

Table 3: Estimated risk of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days after non-cardiac surgery. From CCS Guidelines (Duceppe et al).28  CI, confidence interval.


Almost all available randomized studies have demonstrated a positive relationship between pre-operative BNP/NT-proBNP levels and adverse post-operative cardiac outcomes. Therefore BNP/NT-proBNP are useful biomarkers for predicting adverse outcomes after a surgical procedure. However it is difficult to find a precise level of BNP which predicts the adverse event risk with acceptable precision.  As a result, the use of BNP in perioperative risk assessment remains uncertain. Major international guidelines disagree. Current recommendations and major guidelines are based on limited available evidence, and further large-scale randomized studies are required to achieve a standard guideline.

Ethics approval:  Not required

Conflicts of interest: None

Funding: Not required.

Provenance:  Externally reviewed

Author’s address: Dr MT Iddagoda, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital, PO Box X2213, Perth, Western Australia 6847, Australia.


1.Kehlet H, Mythen M. Why is the surgical high-risk patient still at risk? Br J Anaesth 2011; 106: 289–291.

2.Moonesinghe SR, Mythen MG, Grocott MP.  Patient-related risk factors for postoperative adverse events.  Curr Opin Crit Care 2009; 15: 320-7.

3.Biccard BM, Rodseth RN.  The pathophysiology of peri‐operative myocardial infarction.  Anaesthesia. 2010; 65: 733-41.

4.Devereaux PJ, Goldman L, Yusuf S, Gilbert K, Leslie K, Guyatt GH.  Surveillance and prevention of major perioperative ischemic cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a review. Can Med Assoc J 2005; 173: 779-88.

5.Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, et al.  Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018).  J Am Coll Cardiol 2018; 72: 2231-64.

6.Biccard BM, Devereaux PJ, Rodseth RN.  Cardiac biomarkers in the prediction of risk in the non‐cardiac surgery setting.  Anaesthesia 2014; 69: 484-93.

7.Botto F, Alonso-Coello P, Chan MT, Villar JC, Xavier D, et al.  Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a large, international, prospective cohort study establishing diagnostic criteria, characteristics, predictors, and 30-day outcomes.  Anesthesiol 2014; 120: 564-78.

8.Gibson SC, Payne CJ, Byrne DS, Berry C, Dargie HJ, Kingsmore DB.  B‐type natriuretic peptide predicts cardiac morbidity and mortality after major surgery. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 903-9.

9.Clerico A, Giannoni A, Vittorini S, Passino C.  Thirty years of the heart as an endocrine organ: physiological role and clinical utility of cardiac natriuretic hormones. Am J Physiol Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2011; 301: H12-20.

10.Rodseth RN, Biccard BM, Le Manach Y, Sessler DI, Buse GA, et al.  The prognostic value of pre-operative and post-operative B-type natriuretic peptides in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal fragment of pro-B-type natriuretic peptide: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.  J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 170-80.

11.Karthikeyan G, Moncur RA, Levine O, Heels-Ansdell D, Chan MT, et al.  Is a pre-operative brain natriuretic peptide or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide measurement an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes within 30 days of noncardiac surgery?  A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54: 1599–606.

12.Biccard BM, Lurati Buse GA, Burkhart C, Cuthbertson BH, Filipovic M, et al.  The influence of clinical risk factors on pre-operative B-type natriuretic peptide risk stratification of vascular surgical patients.  Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 55–9

13.Ryding AD, Kumar S, Worthington AM, Burgess D.  Prognostic value of brain natriuretic peptide in noncardiac surgery: a meta-analysis.  Anesthesiol 2009; 111: 311-9.

14.Rodseth RN, Padayachee L, Biccard BM.  A meta‐analysis of the utility of pre‐operative brain natriuretic peptide in predicting early and intermediate‐term mortality and major adverse cardiac events in vascular surgical patients. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 1226-33.

15.Young YR, Sheu BF, Li WC, Hsieh TM, Hung CW, et al.  Predictive value of plasma brain natriuretic peptide for postoperative cardiac complication – a systemic review and meta-analysis.  J Crit Care 2014 Aug 1; 29(4): 696-e1.

16.Vanderheyden M, Bartunek J, Goethals M.  Brain and other natriuretic peptides: molecular aspects.  Eur J Heart Failure. 2004; 6: 261-8.

17.Schirger JA, Heublein DM, Chen HH, Lisy O, Jougasaki M, et al.  Presence of Dendroaspisnatriuretic peptide-like immunoreactivity in human plasma and its increase during human heart failure.  Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74: 126-30).

18.Weber M, Hamm C.  Role of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and NTproBNP in clinical routine.  Heart 2006; 92: 843-9.

19.Venkatesan S, Myles PR, Manning HJ, Mozid AM, Andersson C, et al.  Cohort study of preoperative blood pressure and risk of 30-day mortality after elective non-cardiac surgery. BJA  Br J Anaesthesia. 2017; 119: 65-77.

20.Dernellis J, Panaretou M.  Assessment of cardiac risk before non-cardiac surgery: brain natriuretic peptide in 1590 patients.  Heart 2006; 92: 1645-50.

21.Leibowitz D, Planer D, Rott D, Elitzur Y, Chajek-Shaul T, Weiss AT.  Brain natriuretic peptide levels predict perioperative events in cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a prospective study.  Cardiology 2008; 110: 266-70.

22.Yun KH, Jeong MH, Oh SK, Choi JH, Rhee SJ, et al.  Preoperative plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide concentration and perioperative cardiovascular risk in elderly patients.  Circ J 2008; 72: 195-9.

23.Ma J, Xin Q, Wang X, Gao M, Wang Y, Liu J.  Prediction of perioperative cardiac events through preoperative NT-pro-BNP and cTnI after emergent non-cardiac surgery in elderly patients. PLOS One. 2015; 10: e0121306.

24.Kim SE, Park DG, Lee JH, Han KR, Oh DJ.  Utility of B-type natriuretic peptide for predicting perioperative cardiovascular events in patients without history of cardiovascular disease undergoing major non-cardiac surgery.  Korean Circ J. 2011;41 (1): 11-5.

25.Mercantini P, Di Somma S, Magrini L, Nava AK, Scarinci A, et al.  Preoperative brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a better predictor of adverse cardiac events compared to preoperative scoring system in patients who underwent abdominal surgery.  World J Surg 2012; 36: 24-30.

26.Fox AA, Body SC.  Assessment of preoperative B-type natriuretic peptide in adult surgery: is it useful? Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2011; 112: 1005.

27.Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, et al.  2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.  J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: e77-137.

28.Duceppe E, Parlow J, MacDonald P, Lyons K, McMullen M, et al.  Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Management for Patients Who Undergo Noncardiac Surgery.  Can J Cardiol 2017; 33: 17-32

29.Kristensen SD, Knuuti J, Saraste A, Anker S, Bøtker HE et al.  2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA).  Eur Heart J 2014 Aug 1; 35: 2383-431.

30.Jafari A, Rezapour A, Hajahmadi M.  Cost-effectiveness of B-type natriuretic peptide-guided care in patients with heart failure: a systematic review.  Heart Failure Rev. 2018; 23: 693-700.

Publication Categories


Dr Mayura T Iddagoda

Royal Perth Hospital